Heidegger's Being and Time, Division II (Part 2)

This lecture discusses Heidegger's concept of temporality and its relation to being and understanding. The speaker explores the complexities of Heidegger's ideas, including the distinction between primordial and authentic temporality. The lecture also touches on the idea of idealism in Heidegger's philosophy and its implications for understanding the world and human existence.

1. 0:00 — Introduction To Hermeneutics
2. 36:40 — Hermeneutic Circle
3. 1:13:41 — Existential Condition
4. 1:50:52 — Temporality And Measurement
5. 2:30:20 — Familiarity And Temporality
6. 3:08:49 — Sequence Of Nows
7. 3:47:25 — Ecstatic Temporal Condition
8. 4:29:28 — Being In The World
9. 5:06:34 — Questioning Idealism
10. 5:44:19 — Aristotle And Idealism
11. 6:21:07 — Heidegger's Idealism
12. 7:01:45 — Realism And Science
13. 7:41:01 — Understanding Of Being
14. 8:29:59 — Fundamental Ontology

Heidegger's Being and Time, Division II (Part 2)

Hubert Dreyfus — 22 recordings in the archive.

The book: Being and Time by Martin Heidegger.

Provenance: University of California, Berkeley · course lectures (Berkeley webcasts).

So there are two sort of completely independent issues coming up now his hermen the hermeneutic situation that he's in that is his sort of methodological considerations and then the nature of selfhood there's no particular connection as far as I can see they just happen to be both in the same section maybe that's another sign of haste is there a connection you looking any more than any with any subject of course the hermeneutical method is going to get you connected to everything but anyway let's go on and do them and if it turns out as we talk about them that there is a deeper connection that I realize we can deal with it so the first one is the methodological issue and I just want to constantly sort of stress my reordering of it looks like finally with guilt conscience resoluteness death anticipatory resoluteness historicality fate and destiny we now ought to have the hole of authentic doine in our grasp but anything short of that we wouldn't so it's a good so that's why I think you have to put all those pieces together first and then you get to a point where you ask what's have we now got the whole of the phenomena so that we can and how are we going to and what kind of hole have we got and how are we going to deal with it and it seems we remember we didn't know what hole meant and why somehow you didn't have a hole at the when he starts the problem and brings in death and the ahead of itself I think it becomes pretty clear that normally by whole he means the total structure of doine and what's funny is he's got the total structure of doine when he's got the structure of care and he's got the structure of care already in division one so it's still not clear to me what the what is missing he seems to be using I as far as I can see synonymously doign being authentic being whole and the totality of the total of the phenomena being exhibited in what doine is doing I'll just read you 358 one of the places where you get these three all coming together at the beginning well the very first sentence of that section on the hermeneutic situation and by the way…